| |||
Web Services The sections below cover the fundamentals of Web services and offer explanations of how such services should be exploited. To go directly to a section, click on one of the links: What are Web Services?Defining Web services is about as tricky as defining terms like application and infrastructure we all use them, nobody knows exactly what they mean, but somehow we muddle along. Consider the following. Point one a software application can be thought of as a set of software elements, each dealing with one part of the functionality. Point two these software elements can communicate using defined protocols and mechanisms. Point three the elements do not need to reside on the same machine. Point four in fact, they can be situated anywhere in the world and they can be managed by any third party. Whoa! Hang on there. Things were going OK until the last point, right? But why not separate components across the Internet it is a good enough basis for human communications, so why not use it for programs (or even parts of programs) to communicate? The more that this is thought about, the more two points become clear:
On the basis of these points (which we shall come back to), there exists the potential to construct applications from piece parts that are accessed over the Internet from different providers. These piece parts are called Web Services. Clearly, mechanisms to support Web Services need to have been accepted as a standard by the major players in the industry in this case, Sun, Microsoft and IBM. Successfully agreed, accepted and adopted are:
It is with application support frameworks where things get tricky. A number of major IT companies are positioning themselves as framework providers indeed, this is where they see that there is money to be made. In particular, Sun, Microsoft, HP and IBM have frameworks of their own namely Sun ONE, Microsoft .Net, HP NetAction and the IBM framework for e-business . Be careful if you look at these sites - we are still at the visionary stage with Web services, it is no coincidence that vapourware starts with a V. IBM need to be careful though their name almost sounds meaningful. The gorillas Sun and Microsoft are worth comparing IDG has a comparison, as does Information Week here. Our Mr Sosnoski has given a presentation on Sun ONE, which also compares Sun ONE to Microsoft .Net. Finally, a technical overview of .NET is given here in the form of the first chapter of a Wrox press book. The final piece in the Web services puzzle is the provision of a communications mechanism, which enables application elements to communicate via the Internet. Here we have open versus proprietary, with the UN- (and Sun)-sponsored ebXML (XML for electronic business) in competition with Microsofts BizTalk. ebXML is described at its own Web site, here; there is also an article at XML.orgs Web site here, which covers both ebXML and UDDI. The other mechanism worthy of mention is RosettaNet to see how the three different mechanisms RosettaNet, ebXML and BizTalk - stack up, see the GCA article here. The Business Benefits of Web ServicesIn the past, applications (distributed and otherwise) have been used by single organizations and accessed over the corporate network. The arrival of the Internet has enabled companies systems and their applications to talk to each other directly, for example in the form of a supply chain or a marketplace. Business benefits are summarised by the various vendors of Web services Sun has a good overview of the current and future benefits here (its marketing but so, for the moment , are Web services). We think that the benefits are a combination of the benefits of ASPs (of which Web services are a logical evolution) and good development practice. Maybe, with Web services, the Shangri-la of software reuse will finally be achieved! Check the section The Future of Web Services for a couple more articles. Deploying Web ServicesFor developing applications, there is quite a lot of material out there on vendors specific Web services offerings (particularly Microsoft), however there is notably less cross-vendor information. Having said that, Microsoft is not particularly advanced either, as you will find here (just search for forthcoming). An introduction to building .Net applications is given here, or at least the index is the navigation from one page to another doesnt currently work. A quick overview of how to create (and access) a Web service is given here. An idea of the principles of deploying Sun One applications can be found here. Or maybe were being polite. As with other areas of application development, patterns provide a means to familiarise yourself with how to solve specific problems. IBM hosts an e-business patterns site here. Issues with Web ServicesWeb services are still new and hence the issues are still to be fleshed out. For the moment they can be summarised as:
Finally, of course, there is the vapourware element of Web services. For a summary of issues click here. The Future of Web ServicesEr hang on, Web services are the future, right? Certainly as far as computer companies are concerned. There are many articles in the press (here is one) describing the gambles that the vendors are be making to be part of this brave, new Web services world. Are they right? Well, we think so. It fits with the trends towards outsourcing, commoditisation and component-based development to name a few. The (registration-based) CBDi Forum puts forward some good arguments for Web services here. Further Resources on Web ServicesOASIS, the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, whose remit includes UDDI and ebXML |
|
|